An Objective Look at Covid-19 and the Vaccines
Introduction
The topic of Covid-19 is a broad ranging and complex topic. It is little wonder that people are confused regarding many aspects of this scourge. It is no help that there seems to be a concerted effort to keep confusion at a debilitating level in order to break down resistance to the mRNA vaccines for Covid-19. This will be shown as we proceed.
In my research to figure out what is going on, I have used many of the government's own websites, including the NIH, WHO and CDC. In addition, I have used the websites, articles and video's of highly credentialed scientists and doctors, three of which for whom I have listed their credentials. I have studiously avoided opinion pieces and sensationalists web sources. The information contained herein is as solidly based on science as I was able to make it.
I provide an extensive list of links to source material, and provide short quotes from the articles to pique your interest. I recommend reviewing the linked pages for yourself.
Perhaps the subject of greatest concern in this paper is the censorship and outright prohibition placed upon early treatment protocols that include Hydroxycloroquine and Ivermectin. In spite of the fact that the NIH's states on it's own website that these treatments could reduce hospitalization and death by 60% plus, the mainstream medical and political establishment, for inexplicable reasons, have prohibited them, and have threatened doctors that prescribe these treatments with decertification and job loss.
It has to be said, I am not a doctor or scientist and provide no advice or recommendations in this paper. I am simply collecting information from credentialed sources so that you can read them and make your own mind up.
The following topics are presented in this paper:
Doctor and Scientist Sources
Understanding The Virus
- A Summary of Geert Vanden Bossche's Explanation
- Understanding Breakthrough Cases
- Animal Reservoirs
Natural Immunity
Vaccine Harm
Booster Shots
The Forbidden Treatments
- Hydroxycloroquine
- Ivermectin
Censorship
Getting Help
Doctor and Scientist Sources
These are three of the eminently qualified doctors and scientists cited in this paper, and their credentials.
Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, DVM
GSK Biologicals:
- Senior Project Leader "Adolescent Vaccine Projects"
- New Biotech Vaccine Development and QC-QA Manager
- Head of Adjuvant Technologies and Althernative Deliveries, R&D
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
- Director, Research Program Leader and Head of Adjuvants
Solvay Biologicals
- Global Project Director Influenza Vaccines
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
- Senior Program Officer, Global Health, Vaccine Discovery
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI)
- Program Manager
Univac
- Chief Innovation and Scientific Officer
German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF)
- Head of the Vaccine Development Office
Vareco
- Managing Director
Dr. Robert Malone
(https://www.rwmalonemd.com/about-us)
Dr. Malone has an extensive bio on his website that can be consulted if there are any questions about his qualifications in the Covid realm.
"Dr. Malone has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications and published abstracts and has over 11,477 citations of his peer reviewed publications, as verified by Google Scholar. His google scholar ranking is “outstanding” for impact factors. He has been an invited speaker at over 50 conferences, has chaired numerous conferences and he has sat on or served as chairperson on numerous NIAID and DoD study sections."
Dr. Malone recently participated in a couple of interviews and explained a great deal regarding the virus, vaccines and censorship. This is recommended viewing.
Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on Latest COVID-19 Data, Booster Shots, and the Shattered Scientific ‘Consensus’ (Part 1) (Natural Immunity vs. Vaccination Immunity)
Dr. Peter McCullough
(https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-mccullough-0842a070)
Dr. McCullough has an extensive bio on his website that can be consulted if there are any questions about his qualifications in the Covid realm.
"Dr. McCullough has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with > 1000 publications and > 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine. His works include the “Interface between Renal Disease and Cardiovascular Illness” in Braunwald’s Heart Disease Textbook. Dr. McCullough is a recipient of the Simon Dack Award from the American College of Cardiology and the International Vicenza Award in Critical Care Nephrology for his scholarship and research. Dr. McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardiorenal Society of America, an organization dedicated to bringing cardiologists and nephrologists together to work on the emerging problem of cardiorenal syndromes. He is the editor-in-chief of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, and senior associate editor of the American Journal of Cardiology. He serves on the editorial boards of multiple specialty journals. He has served as member or chair of data safety monitoring boards of 24 randomized clinical trials."
Dr. McCullough recently participated in a couple of interviews and explained a great deal regarding the virus, vaccines and censorship. These are recommended viewing.
PERSPECTIVES ON THE PANDEMIC XIX
Video: "THIS INTERVIEW COULD SAVE YOUR LIFE" PART ONE: EARLY TREATMENT
(https://www.thepressandthepublic.com/post/perspectives-on-the-pandemic-xix)
PERSPECTIVES ON THE PANDEMIC XX
Video: "THIS INTERVIEW COULD SAVE YOUR LIFE" PART TWO: THE DANGERS OF THE INJECTIONS
(https://www.thepressandthepublic.com/post/perspectives-on-the-pandemic-xx)
"Renowned physician and professor of medicine Dr. Peter McCullough describes early treatment protocols for COVID-19 that have saved countless lives... and the forces that have aligned themselves against their widespread adoption."
Understanding The Virus
The interview attached below between Geert Vanden Bossche PhD DVM, a pro-vax vaccine designer, and Dr. Philip McMilan is without question the most compelling explanation of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination I have seen and read. I will attempt to summarize it and the accompanying letter he wrote to the WHO, but I really encourage people to watch and read for yourselves.
Below is a link to the interview:
Mass Vaccination in a Pandemic - Benefits versus Risks: Interview with Geert Vanden Bossche
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJZxiNxYLpc)
In addition, Geert has produced a letter to the WHO which also explains the issue:
Letter to the WHO Authored by Geert Vanden Bossche
Finally, Del Bigtree of The Highwire provides an analysis for the layman.
A Coming Covid Catastrophe
A Summary of Geert's Explanation
Geert explains:
"THE key question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’. Indeed, antibodies (Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral antibiotics, regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system (so-called ‘natural’ Abs’) or elicited in response to specific pathogens (resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs)."
It is commonly known that all of the Covid-19 vaccines are "leaky". Leaky defines a group of vaccines that are designed to affect the disease, I.E. reduce symptoms, but they do not eradicate the virus itself. This is why vaccinated people who contract the virus continue to carry the virus after vaccination. Fauci explained this as well, indicating that since the vaccine does not kill the virus, the vaccinated experiencing breakthrough cases still carry just as much of the virus around with them as the unvaccinated who contract Covid-19.
Fauci: Amount of virus in breakthrough delta cases 'almost identical' to unvaccinated
"What we learned that's new, John, in answer to your question, is that when you look at the level of virus in the nasopharynx of people who are vaccinated who get breakthrough infections, it's really quite high and equivalent to the level of virus in the nasopharynx of unvaccinated people who get infected," Fauci said."
Geert Continues:
"Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specifc features of our enemy. This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription). Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population's) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’)."
What Geert is explaining here is that coronaviruses that are in the body are not killed, and that are exposed to the vaccine, experience "Selection Pressure". This selection pressure causes the virus to mutate to mitigate the pressure applied to it. The virus mutates to a form that the vaccine is not as effective against. Selection pressure and mutation are a function of a leaky vaccine. While vaccines all mutate to some degree, the vaccines are pressuring the virus to mutate much more forcefully, producing stronger and more deadly viral mutations.
Vaccines are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve
(https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510)
"Just as pathogens have different ways of infecting and affecting us, the vaccines that scientists develop employ different immunological strategies. Most of the vaccines we get in childhood prevent pathogens from replicating inside us and thereby also prevent us from transmitting the infections to others. But scientists have so far been unable to make these kinds of sterilizing vaccines for complicated pathogens like HIV, anthrax and malaria. To conquer these diseases, some researchers have been developing immunizations that prevent disease without actually preventing infections — what are called “leaky” vaccines. And these new vaccines may incite a different, and potentially scarier, kind of microbial evolution."
With Covid-19, the mutated virus is causing "breakthrough cases" (where a vaccinated person comes down with Covid-19 anyway). At this time Delta is raging throughout the world, and other variants are being closely watched, including the Lambda and Mu variants. These variants have managed to mutate fast enough and effective enough to cause large numbers of already vaccinated people to come down with Covid-19.
PHE released a report revealing 62% of alleged Covid deaths are people who’ve been vaccinated
"But the data shows that people over the age of 50 who are unvaccinated account for just 10% of the alleged confirm Covid cases, whilst those who are fully vaccinated account for 37% of the alleged confirmed cases. A further 40% of the alleged cases are people who had received one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine at least 21 days prior to their alleged confirmed Covid-19 infection."
Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021
(https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm)
"In July 2021, following multiple large public events in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, town, 469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents who had traveled to the town during July 3–17; 346 (74%) occurred in fully vaccinated persons. Testing identified the Delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients. Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not."
Georgia football coach says team has COVID-19 'spike' despite high vaccination rate (09-07-2021)
"University of Georgia head football coach Kirby Smart said this week that the team is having a COVID-19 outbreak despite a high vaccination rate, ESPN reported."
"For us, we're at our highest spike. And people are talking about vaccinations — well, these are people that are vaccinated. We're talking about breakthroughs, and so that concerns you not only for the players on your team that are unvaccinated, that are playing and not playing, because we want everybody to be safe,” Smart said.
"Last month, Smart said 90 percent of the team's players, staff members and coaches have been vaccinated against the virus, according to ESPN."
"Kiffin shared last month that all of the players and staff members have received the COVID-19 vaccine."
Vaccine Breakthrough Infections Reported to CDC — United States, January 1–April 30, 2021
(https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e3.htm)
The CDC is no longer tracking breakthrough cases unless hospitalization or death occurs. There is no way to accurately measure breakthrough cases, contributing to the confusion surrounding breakthrough cases.
"Beginning May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections to investigating only those among patients who are hospitalized or die, thereby focusing on the cases of highest clinical and public health significance. CDC will continue to lead studies in multiple U.S. sites to evaluate vaccine effectiveness and collect information on all COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections regardless of clinical status. Additional information and resources to help public health departments and laboratories investigate and report COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html."
The number of vaccinated breakthrough cases seems to indicate that yes, the virus is not being killed with these vaccines, and secondly, the virus is mutating and thus the vaccines are loosing their effectiveness, since they are designed to function against specific mutations.
Geert continues:
"As the selected mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects. The more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects do). Unfortunately enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, suffice to bypass people’s innate/natural Ab. Those are put out of business as their affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs. This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in the population, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific Abs will steadily increase. Consequently, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease in their innate immunity will increase. As a result, a steadily increasing number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all."
Geert explains that the viral mutations caused by selection pressure cause the virus to become increasingly infectious and severe. There are a couple things going on here. First is that the vaccine is designed for a specific virus design. When the virus mutates, it is moving away from the design the vaccine was intended to fight, and the mutated virus consist of a new form of the virus that is selectively enhanced. This results in more serious illnesses.
Starting with "Unfortunately enough, ", Geert is explaining the issue where the vaccine is bypassing the natural immune system in the response to the virus because it is designed to do that. Unfortunately, he says, the mutated virus is basically being permitted access to the human body because it has mutated and the vaccine is not targeting the new version, but the old version, and to make matters worse, natural immunity can't do anything about it because it is being bypassed by the mRNA.
WHO warns new Covid variants are 'highly problematic' and could further stress hospitals
Geert continues:
"At some point, in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in term of ‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness) in an attempt to further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface of permissive epithelial cells. This will now allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully resist S-specific anti-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the later are elicited by the vaccine or by natural infection."
'A Few Mutations Away': The Threat of a Vaccine-Proof Variant
(https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210730/threat-of-vaccine-proof-covid-variant)
It is important to realize that the doctors and scientist that I'm quoting here concur that it is a leaky vaccine in a vaccinated person that is bringing about dangerous mutations.
""The problem is if the virus changes in such a way that the spike protein — which the antibodies from the vaccine are directed against — are no longer effective at binding and destroying the virus, and the virus escapes immune surveillance," Nelson says.
If this occurs, he says, "we will have an ineffective vaccine, essentially. And we'll be back to where we were last March with a brand-new disease.""
The Danger of the Delta Variant
(https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/the-danger-of-the-delta-variant/)
William Hanage at Harvard was recently interviewed regarding the dangers of the Delta Variant.
"Q: You were recently quoted on PRI’s The World as saying, “The emergency of Delta is catastrophic.” Just how worried should we be?
A: Delta is highly transmissible—about 60% more so than the previously dominant Alpha, which was itself more transmissible than the original virus—and more virulent.
It appears that, in comparison with the previously dominant virus, Delta produces higher viral loads earlier in infection, which may mean that it’s even more infectious during the period when people don’t yet realize they’re infected."
Delta Variant: What We Know About the Science
(https://www.cdc.gov/.../2019.../variants/delta-variant.html)
"The Delta variant causes more infections and spreads faster than early forms of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19
- The Delta variant spreads more easily than other variants
- The Delta variant is more contagious: The Delta variant is highly contagious, more than 2x as contagious as previous variants.
- Some data suggest the Delta variant might cause more severe illness than previous variants in unvaccinated people. In two different studies from Canada and Scotland, patients infected with the Delta variant were more likely to be hospitalized than patients infected with Alpha or the original virus that causes COVID-19."
What Geert is saying above is that in the very near future, the virus will reach full vaccine resistance. It will reach this point because it will have mutated to the point that it binds to the cell more effectively than the antibodies in the vaccine can.
As Geert says:
"Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system."
In the "Vaccines are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve" linked above, the author makes the following point:
"The problem with leaky vaccines, Read says, is that they enable pathogens to replicate unchecked while also protecting hosts from illness and death, thereby removing the costs associated with increased virulence. Over time, then, in a world of leaky vaccinations, a pathogen might evolve to become deadlier to unvaccinated hosts because it can reap the benefits of virulence without the costs — much as Marek’s disease has slowly become more lethal to unvaccinated chickens. This virulence can also cause the vaccine to start failing by causing illness in vaccinated hosts.
In addition to Marek’s disease, Read has been studying malaria, which is the target of several leaky vaccines currently in development. In a 2012 paper published in PLOS Biology, Read and Vicki Barclay, his postdoc at the time, inoculated mice with a component of several leaky malaria vaccines currently being tested in clinical trials. They then used these infected-but-not-sick mice to infect other vaccinated mice. After the parasites circulated through 21 rounds of vaccinated mice, Barclay and Read studied them and compared them to malaria parasites that had circulated through 21 rounds of unvaccinated mice. The strains from the vaccinated mice, they found, had grown far more virulent, in that they replicated faster and killed more red blood cells. At the end of 21 rounds of infection, these more quickly growing, deadly parasites were the only ones left."
Note that it is the vaccinated who through selection pressure and immune escape are increasing the threat of mutations and thus serious illness to the unvaccinated.
The whole idea of viral immune escape can be seen in the parallel with antibiotics, when people are not taking the full course that is needed to kill the bacteria. When a portion of the course is used, the bacteria survive and they mutate and as a result, the antibiotic becomes less effective to the point that people who are infected begin to "shed" (pass on) the infection because it has not been killed. The same thing is going on with the Covid-19 vaccines.
Understanding Breakthrough Cases
A breakthrough case is defined as a presentation of Covid-19 symptoms in a person who was previously vaccinated. Breakthrough cases are prompting calls for booster shots as the current vaccines are becoming less effective against the current mutations of the virus.
Several examples have been given above. Below are additional examples and information.
Virus czar calls to begin readying for eventual 4th vaccine dose
Salman Zarka says COVID-19 is here to stay for and that next booster shot may be adjusted for variants: ‘This is our life from now on, in waves’
(https://www.timesofisrael.com/virus-czar-calls-to-begin-readying-for-eventual-4th-vaccine-dose/)
"Israel’s national coronavirus czar on Saturday called for the country to begin making preparations to eventually administer fourth doses of the coronavirus vaccine.
“Given that that the virus is here and will continue to be here, we also need to prepare for a fourth injection,” Salman Zarka told Kan public radio.
He did not specify when fourth vaccine shots could eventually be administered.
Zarka also said that the next booster shot may be modified to better protect against new variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19, such as the highly infectious Delta strain.
“This is our life from now on, in waves,” he said.
Pfizer Shot Just 39% Effective Against Delta Infection, But Largely Prevents Severe Illness, Israel Study Suggests
"A full course of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was just 39% effective at preventing infections and 41% effective at preventing symptomatic infections caused by the Delta Covid-19 variant, according to Israel’s health ministry, down from early estimates of 64% two weeks ago."
It is worth noting that while the vaccines are not killing the virus and causing mutations, it does seem to help in preventing hospitalization and death. This has to be weighted against the effects on the immune system and risk of serious side affects.
"The two-dose vaccine still works very well in preventing people from getting seriously sick, demonstrating 88% effectiveness against hospitalization and 91% effectiveness against severe illness, according to the Israeli data."
Fauci: Amount of virus in breakthrough delta cases 'almost identical' to unvaccinated
"What we learned that's new, John, in answer to your question, is that when you look at the level of virus in the nasopharynx of people who are vaccinated who get breakthrough infections, it's really quite high and equivalent to the level of virus in the nasopharynx of unvaccinated people who get infected," Fauci said."
Analysis of Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic Transmission in SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak, Germany, 2020
(https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/4/20-4576_article)
"Abstract
We determined secondary attack rates (SAR) among close contacts of 59 asymptomatic and symptomatic coronavirus disease case-patients by presymptomatic and symptomatic exposure. We observed no transmission from asymptomatic case-patients and highest SAR through presymptomatic exposure. Rapid quarantine of close contacts with or without symptoms is needed to prevent presymptomatic transmission."
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33219229/)
"Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270-0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases."
A grim warning from Israel: Vaccination blunts, but does not defeat Delta
(https://www.science.org/news/2021/08/grim-warning-israel-vaccination-blunts-does-not-defeat-delta)
"Israel has among the world’s highest levels of vaccination for COVID-19, with 78% of those 12 and older fully vaccinated, the vast majority with the Pfizer vaccine. Yet the country is now logging one of the world’s highest infection rates, with nearly 650 new cases daily per million people. More than half are in fully vaccinated people, underscoring the extraordinary transmissibility of the Delta variant and stoking concerns that the benefits of vaccination ebb over time."
See also: Nearly 60% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Israel fully vaccinated, data shows
Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021
(https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm)
"In July 2021, following multiple large public events in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, town, 469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents who had traveled to the town during July 3–17; 346 (74%) occurred in fully vaccinated persons. Testing identified the Delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients. Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not."
Georgia football coach says team has COVID-19 'spike' despite high vaccination rate (09-07-2021)
"University of Georgia head football coach Kirby Smart said this week that the team is having a COVID-19 outbreak despite a high vaccination rate, ESPN reported."
"For us, we're at our highest spike. And people are talking about vaccinations — well, these are people that are vaccinated. We're talking about breakthroughs, and so that concerns you not only for the players on your team that are unvaccinated, that are playing and not playing, because we want everybody to be safe,” Smart said.
"Last month, Smart said 90 percent of the team's players, staff members and coaches have been vaccinated against the virus, according to ESPN."
"Kiffin shared last month that all of the players and staff members have received the COVID-19 vaccine."
Vaccine Breakthrough Infections Reported to CDC — United States, January 1–April 30, 2021
(https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e3.htm)
The CDC is no longer tracking breakthrough cases unless hospitalization or death occurs. There is no way to accurately measure breakthrough cases.
"Beginning May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections to investigating only those among patients who are hospitalized or die, thereby focusing on the cases of highest clinical and public health significance. CDC will continue to lead studies in multiple U.S. sites to evaluate vaccine effectiveness and collect information on all COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections regardless of clinical status. Additional information and resources to help public health departments and laboratories investigate and report COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html."
Study finds no difference in COVID viral loads between vaccinated and unvaccinated; symptomatic and asymptomatic
"“We really wanted to focus on this public health message, which is that our data show there are a lot of asymptomatic people that have high viral loads, there are a lot of vaccinated people that have high viral loads and there are kids that have high viral loads,” said David Coil, a project scientist with the UC Davis Genome Center and one of the study’s authors.
Coil noted that there are misconceptions that children aren’t necessarily spreading the virus or that if someone is vaccinated and not showing symptoms they’re fine, “but the fact that we see really high viral loads in all these different populations suggests that public health messaging should be more universally applied.”"
Animal Reservoirs
There is also concern about "Animal Reservoirs". Animals can carry the Covid-19 virus, and they can be a threat to humans. There are already cases of transmission between animals and humans and humans and animals. This could complicate an already complex response to the virus.
Animal Reservoirs and Hosts for Emerging Alphacoronaviruses and Betacoronaviruses
(https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/4/20-3945_article)
"The ongoing global pandemic caused by coronavirus disease has once again demonstrated the role of the family Coronaviridae in causing human disease outbreaks. Because severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was first detected in December 2019, information on its tropism, host range, and clinical manifestations in animals is limited. Given the limited information, data from other coronaviruses might be useful for informing scientific inquiry, risk assessment, and decision-making. We reviewed endemic and emerging infections of alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses in wildlife, livestock, and companion animals and provide information on the receptor use, known hosts, and clinical signs associated with each host for 15 coronaviruses detected in humans and animals."
Animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2: calculable COVID-19 risk for older adults from animal to human transmission
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34460063/)
"The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the highly contagious respiratory pathogen SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), has already claimed close to three million lives. SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic disease: it emerged from a bat reservoir and it can infect a number of agricultural and companion animal species. SARS-CoV-2 can cause respiratory and intestinal infections, and potentially systemic multi-organ disease, in both humans and animals. The risk for severe illness and death with COVID-19 significantly increases with age, with older adults at highest risk. To combat the pandemic and protect the most susceptible group of older adults, understanding the human-animal interface and its relevance to disease transmission is vitally important. Currently high infection numbers are being sustained via human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Yet, identifying potential animal reservoirs and potential vectors of the disease will contribute to stronger risk assessment strategies."
Will COVID-19 Establish an Animal Reservoir?
(https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/147257-will-covid-19-establish-an-animal-reservoir)
“Since June 2020, 214 human cases of COVID-19 have been identified in Denmark with SARS-CoV-2 variants associated with farmed minks, including 12 cases with a unique variant, reported on 5 November,” WHO stated. “All 12 cases were identified in September 2020 in North Jutland, Denmark. The cases ranged in age from 7 to 79 years, and eight had a link to the mink farming industry, and four cases were from the local community.”
"To head off the threat, Danish officials are culling more than 17 million farmed minks and will conduct mass PCR testing of the human population in the Jutland area. They are increasing surveillance of the local population to detect all COVID-19 cases, including through population-wide mass PCR testing for the region of North Jutland. Officials also will conduct genetic sequencing of human and mink SARS-CoV-2 to identify the mutated strain. Mitigation efforts include limiting transportation and movement between Jutland and other cities.
“Minks were infected following exposure from infected humans,” WHO reported. “Minks can act as a reservoir of SARS-CoV-2, passing the virus between them, and pose a risk for virus spillover from mink to humans. People can then transmit this virus within the human population. Additionally, spillback (human-to-mink transmission) can occur.”
COVID-19 infections spread through gorillas at Atlanta zoo
(https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/covid-19-infections-spread-gorillas-atlanta-zoo-79959057)
"ATLANTA -- Atlanta's zoo says at least 13 western lowland gorillas have tested positive for COVID-19, including 60-year-old Ozzie, the oldest male gorilla in captivity.
Zoo Atlanta said Friday that employees noticed the gorillas had been coughing, had runny noses and showed changes in appetite. A veterinary lab at the University of Georgia returned positive tests for the respiratory illness. Zoo Atlanta says it’s waiting on confirmation from the National Veterinary Services Lab in Ames, Iowa.
The zoo says it is treating the gorillas at risk of developing complications from SARS-CoV-2 with monoclonal antibodies. The zoo is also testing all 20 of its gorillas, who live in four troops."
Note that the worker that supposedly passed the virus to the gorillas is said to be wearing a mask and gloves, but the gorillas got Covid-19 anyway.
Natural Immunity
When an unvaccinated person is infected with Covid-19, their natural immune system comes into play. Natural Immunity is proving to be 20-30 times more effective against reducing the occurrence and severity of subsequent infections with the same mutation. Persons who are vaccinated bypass natural immunity and thus natural immunity does not come into play. This sets up a scenario where vaccines must be constantly modified for future mutations and constantly administered to those already vaccinated as their vaccine effectiveness declines.
Rapid Response: We must stop ignoring natural immunity - it’s now long overdue!
(https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0)
"Infection generates immunity. The “SIREN” study in the Lancet addressed the relationships between seropositivity in people with previous COVID-19 infection and subsequent risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 infection over the subsequent 7-12 months (2). Prior infection decreased risk of symptomatic re-infection by 93%. A large cohort study published in JAMA Internal Medicine looked at 3.2 million US patients and showed that the risk of infection was significantly lower (0.3%) in seropositive patients v/s those who are seronegative (3%) (3).
Perhaps even more important to the question of duration of immunity is a recent study that has demonstrated the presence of long-lived memory immune cells in those who have recovered from COVID-19 (4). This implies a prolonged (perhaps years) capacity to respond to new infection with new antibodies."
"In contrast to this collective data demonstrating both adequate and long-lasting protection in those who have recovered from COVID-19, the duration of vaccine-induced immunity is not fully known - but breakthrough infections in Israel, Iceland and in the US suggests a few months. Before CDC decided to stop collecting data on all breakthrough infections at the end of April, 2021, it reported >10,000 breakthrough infections (2 weeks after completion of vaccination) in the US, with a mortality of ~2% (6). Booster COVID vaccine recommendations have been already announced in Israel and in the US proving vaccine failure within 6 months."
Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel
"Vaccination was highly effective with overall estimated efficacy for documented infection of 92·8% (CI:[92·6, 93·0]); hospitalization 94·2% (CI:[93·6, 94·7]); severe illness 94·4% (CI:[93·6, 95·0]); and death 93·7% (CI:[92·5, 94·7]). Similarly, the overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94·8% (CI:[94·4, 95·1]); hospitalization 94·1% (CI:[91·9, 95·7]); and severe illness 96·4% (CI:[92·5, 98·3]). Our results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals."
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
(https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1)
"Results SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected."
"Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant."
Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?
Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated - compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.
(https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762)
"According to a report by Israel's Channel 13, Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination."
"More than 7,700 new cases of the virus have been detected during the most recent wave starting in May, but just 72 of the confirmed cases were reported in people who were known to have been infected previously – that is, less than 1% of the new cases."
"Roughly 40% of new cases – or more than 3,000 patients – involved people who had been infected despite being vaccinated."
Why is Covid Natural Immunity Being Ignored?
(https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/09/why_is_covid_natural_immunity_being_ignored.html)
"Dr. Fauci’s employer, the NIH, announced in January 2021, “The immune systems of more than 95% of people who recovered from COVID-19 had durable memories of the virus up to eight months after infection.” At that time, COVID had been prominently on the scene since March 2020, 10 months previously. Allowing time for the NIH to gather data and report it, in essence, they are saying that thus far, immunity in the infected has not waned."
"Another study, published in the prestigious journal Nature, demonstrated that T-cell immunity in patients recovering from 2003 SARS (similar to our current SARS-CoV-2 infection) was still robust 17 years post-infection. This study was performed 17 years after the 2003 SARS outbreak meaning that immunity showed no signs of waning to date and could potentially last a lifetime."
"Vaccines target only the spike protein, which can mutate, unlike natural immunity which targets dozens of viral proteins, making mutation or resistance far less likely. In addition, natural infection provides “mucosal immunity,” according to this microbiology paper published last month, providing a first line of defense in our airways, something that vaccine immunity does not offer."
Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?
(https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101)
"As covid cases surged in Israel this summer, the Ministry of Health reported the numbers by immunity status. Between 5 July and 3 August, just 1% of weekly new cases were in people who had previously had covid-19. Given that 6% of the population are previously infected and unvaccinated, “these numbers look very low,” says Dvir Aran, a biomedical data scientist at the Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, who has been analysing Israeli data on vaccine effectiveness and provided weekly ministry reports to The BMJ. While Aran is cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, he acknowledged “the data suggest that the recovered have better protection than people who were vaccinated.”
Vaccine Harm
VAERS COVID Vaccine - Adverse Event Reports
(https://openvaers.com/covid-data)
From (https://openvaers.com):
"VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov."
The following are the statistics for harm done by vaccines as of Sept 03, 2021:
Deaths - 14,506
Hospitalizations - 58,440
Urgent Care - 77,919
Doctor Visits - 106,184
Anaphylaxis - 5,783
Bell's Palsy - 7,911
Miscarriages - 1,757
Heart Attacks - 6,422
Myocarditis/Pericarditis - 5,371
Permenently Disabled - 18,439
Thrombocytopenia - 2,910
Left Threatening - 14,594
Severe Allergic Reaction - 27,336
Shingles - 7,810
Vigi Access
"Covid-19 Vaccine contains the active ingredient(s): Covid-19 vaccine.
Result is presented for the active ingredient(s).
Total number of records retrieved: 2,125,702."
"VigiAccess was launched by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015 to provide public access to information in VigiBase, the WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products. Side effects – known technically as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) – are reported by national pharmacovigilance centres or national drug regulatory authorities that are members of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring (PIDM). WHO PIDM was created in 1968 to ensure the safer and more effective use of medicinal products."
Historical Vaccine Safety Concerns
(https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history.html)
"Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain-Barré Syndrome
In 1976 there was a small increased risk of a serious neurological disorder called Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with a swine flu vaccine. The increased risk was approximately 1 additional case of GBS for every 100,000 people who got the swine flu vaccine. When over 40 million people were vaccinated against swine flu, federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization until the issue could be explored."
1 in 1,000,000 is 400 vaccine driven cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome in 40,000,000. After 400 vaccinations were performed, the vaccinations were halted so that the issue could be studied.
Currently, as of Sep 3rd, the Covid vaccine has caused 10s of thousands of cases of various diseases, and yet, vaccination continues. I.E., 200,000,000 vaccines delivered would equate to 2,000 reported cases of harm. We are way past that.
Shots and Shingles: What Do They Tell Us?
(https://doctors4covidethics.org/shots-and-shingles-what-do-they-tell-us/)
"Shingles result from reactivation of dormant VZV and betray a slackening of immune control over the virus. There are numerous reports of shingles occurring shortly after COVID vaccination."
"We should be reminded that complications of infectious mononucleosis – the disease caused by an initial infection with EBV – occur infrequently; but if they do, they may be so dramatic as to be the predominant manifestation of the illness. These complications include thrombocytopenia, encephalitis, Bell’s palsy and other cranial nerve palsies, Guillain-Barre syndrome, seizures, transverse myelitis, psychosis, myocarditis and interstitial pneumonitis. All of these have been reported as adverse events in persons who had received COVID vaccines."
"We also draw attention to warnings by clinical pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, who reports that in his own diagnostic lab there has been a very significant increase in the number of histopathological cancer diagnoses since the “vaccinations” started. Cole attributes this to the immunosuppressive effect of the “vaccines.” "
Thousands more people than usual are dying ... but it’s not from Covid
(https://news.yahoo.com/analysis-thousands-more-usual-dying-170117640.html)
"Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.
Acute and chronic respiratory infections were also up with 3,416 more mentions on death certificates than expected since the start of July, while there have been 1,234 extra urinary system disease deaths, 324 with cirrhosis and liver disease and 1,905 with diabetes."
Booster Shots
Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses
(https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02046-8/fulltext)
"Boosting might ultimately be needed in the general population because of waning immunity to the primary vaccination or because variants expressing new antigens have evolved to the point at which immune responses to the original vaccine antigens no longer protect adequately against currently circulating viruses.
Although the benefits of primary COVID-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the risks, there could be risks if boosters are widely introduced too soon, or too frequently, especially with vaccines that can have immune-mediated side-effects (such as myocarditis, which is more common after the second dose of some mRNA vaccines,or Guillain-Barre syndrome, which has been associated with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines). If unnecessary boosting causes significant adverse reactions, there could be implications for vaccine acceptance that go beyond COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate."
Two of the authors quit the FDA, Philip Krause and Marion Gruber, director and vice-director of the FDA’s vaccine research review bureau, quit, it is suspected because of the pushing of boosters without the FDA approvals required.
Data shows Covid booster shots are 'not appropriate' at this time, U.S. and international scientists conclude
"An expert review of scientific evidence to date has concluded that Covid-19 vaccine booster shots are not needed at this time for the general public, a group of leading U.S. and international scientists said Monday in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet.
The conclusion by scientists, including two senior Food and Drug Administration officials and the World Health Organization, came as studies continue to show the authorized Covid vaccines in the U.S. remain highly effective against severe disease and hospitalization caused by the fast-spreading delta variant."
The Forbidden Treatment
This portion of this paper is the most disturbing of everything exposed here.
Hydroxychoroquine and Ivermectin have proven in studies to be effective in the treatment of Covid-19 cases. The NIH itself states this on their website, giving a statistic that provided early, these drugs could reduce hospitalization and deaths by 60% and more.
And yet, the political and medical establishment has chosen to prohibit doctors from prescribing them. This prohibition goes so far as having many Physicians organizations threaten doctors who do prescribe these medications with de-certification and job loss. Additional government reimbursements for treating Medicare patients is being withheld for anything except giving the vaccine.
Essentially, what is happening here is that by refusing to allow doctors to prescribe early treatment with protocols that include Hydroxycloroquine and Ivermectin they are increasing the hospitalization and death rate by up to 60% in an attempt to force people onto the vaccine.
As you read through these government papers proclaiming the virtues of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, their subsequent prohibition is inexplicable and highly suspicious.
Hydroxycloroquine
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/)
"Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds. "
Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High Risk Covid-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as key to the Pandemic Crisis
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32458969/)
"HCQ + AZ has been used as the standard of care in more than 300,000 older adults with multiple comorbid conditions; the estimated proportion of such patients diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmia attributable to the medications is 47 per 100,000 users, among whom estimated mortality is less than 20% (9/100,000 users), as compared with the 10,000 Americans now dying each week. These medications need to be made widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe."
Drug Combo with Hydroxychloroquine Promising: NYU Study
"Researchers at NYU's Grossman School of Medicine found patients given the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine along with zinc sulphate and the antibiotic azithromycin were 44 percent less likely to die from the coronavirus."
Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection
(https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext)
"Zinc is a known inhibitor of coronavirus replication. Clinical trials of zinc lozenges in the common cold have demonstrated modest reductions in the duration and or severity of symptoms. By extension, this readily available nontoxic therapy could be deployed at the first signs of COVID-19."
"Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial/anti-inflammatory drug that impairs endosomal transfer of virions within human cells. HCQ is also a zinc ionophore that conveys zinc intracellularly to block the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is the core enzyme of the virus replication. The currently completed retrospective studies and randomized trials have generally shown these findings: 1) when started late in the hospital course and for short durations of time, antimalarials appear to be ineffective, 2) when started earlier in the hospital course, for progressively longer durations and in outpatients, antimalarials may reduce the progression of disease, prevent hospitalization, and are associated with reduced mortality."
Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33387997/)
"In countries where therapeutic nihilism is prevalent, patients endure escalating symptoms and without early treatment can succumb to delayed in-hospital care and death. Prompt early initiation of sequenced multidrug therapy (SMDT) is a widely and currently available solution to stem the tide of hospitalizations and death. A multipronged therapeutic approach includes 1) adjuvant nutraceuticals, 2) combination intracellular anti-infective therapy, 3) inhaled/oral corticosteroids, 4) antiplatelet agents/anticoagulants, 5) supportive care including supplemental oxygen, monitoring, and telemedicine."
Early multidrug treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) and reduced mortality among nursing home (or outpatient/ambulatory) residents
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34130113/)
"The outbreak of COVID-19 from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread all over the world with tremendous morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In-hospital treatment addresses the multifaceted nature of the illness including initial viral replication, cytokine storm, and endothelial injury with thrombosis. We identified nine reports of early treatment outcomes in COVID-19 nursing home patients. Multi-drug therapy including hydroxychloroquine with one or more anti-infectives, corticosteroids, and antithrombotic anti-blood clotting agents can be extended to seniors in the nursing home setting without hospitalization. Data from nine studies found hydroxychloroquine-based multidrug regimens were associated with a statistically significant > 60% reduction in mortality." (Bold is mine).
COVID-19 outpatients: early risk-stratified treatment with zinc plus low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective case series study
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258)
"Highlights
First COVID-19 outpatient study based on risk stratification and early antiviral treatment at the beginning of the disease.
Low-dose hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc and azithromycin was an effective therapeutic approach against COVID-19.
Significantly reduced hospitalisation rates in the treatment group.
Reduced mortality rates in the treatment group."
Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32623082/)
"Conclusions and relevance: In this multi-hospital assessment, when controlling for COVID-19 risk factors, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality. Prospective trials are needed to examine this impact."
In an interesting turn of events, the Lancet allowed an article on it's website that claimed the drug was controversial because of President Trump and caused several studies to be halted. They were later found to be incorrect.
Authors retract influential Lancet article that found hydroxychloroquine risks
(https://news.yahoo.com/study-authors-retract-influential-lancet-190806177.html)
"The anti-malarial drug has been controversial in part due to support from Trump, as well as implications of the study published in British medical journal the Lancet last month, which led several COVID-19 studies to be halted.
The three authors said Surgisphere, the company that provided the data, would not transfer the dataset for an independent review and that they "can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources."
The Lancet has made one of the biggest retractions in modern history. How could this happen?
"The Lancet is one of the oldest and most respected medical journals in the world. Recently, they published an article on Covid patients receiving hydroxychloroquine with a dire conclusion: the drug increases heartbeat irregularities and decreases hospital survival rates. This result was treated as authoritative, and major drug trials were immediately halted – because why treat anyone with an unsafe drug?
Now, that Lancet study has been retracted, withdrawn from the literature entirely, at the request of three of its authors who “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources”. Given the seriousness of the topic and the consequences of the paper, this is one of the most consequential retractions in modern history."
Ivermectin
A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness (National Institutes of Health)
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/)
"A 5-day course of ivermectin was found to be safe and effective in treating adult patients with mild COVID-19."
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/)
"A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns."
Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383101/)
"Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments."
Uttar Pradesh: 23 districts are now Covid-19 free, recovery rate over 98%
"As many as 23 districts in Uttar Pradesh have now become free from Covid-19. The recovery rate has climbed up to 98.6 per cent, proving the success of the 'UP's Covid Control Model' in eradicating the lethal virus, a government official said.
The districts that have become Covid free are Amethi, Baghpat, Banda, Basti, Bijnor, Chitrakoot, Deoria, Etah, Farrukhabad, Fatehpur, Gonda, Hamirpur, Hardoi, Jaunpur, Kanpur Dehat, Mahoba, Mau, Muzaffarnagar, Pilibhit, Rampur, Sant Kabir Nagar, Sitapur, and Unnao.
None of the 75 districts in Uttar Pradesh have reported fresh cases in double-digits lately. Moreover, 62 districts have reported no cases in the last 24 hours. The 13 other districts have reported new cases in just single digits."
Hydroxycloroquine and Ivermectin are drugs that should be used at the onset of disease. It is important that people have access to these drugs as soon as they test positive.
They are not useful for late onset after the patient is in distress and the lungs are failing to transfer oxygen to the bloodstream.
This is contrary to practice today where those who contract Covid 19 or have a positive test are told to stay home. It is only later when it is basically "too late" that 911 is called and then they are brought to the hospital.
Censorship
The American Board of Emergency Medicine appears to be putting teeth into preventing doctors from talking about such things as Hydroxycloroquine, Ivermectin and other treatments. Note that a physician that speaks out of line with the party risks loosing their certification and job.
Recently, (Sept 2, 2021) the American Medical Association published the following:
Why ivermectin should not be used to prevent or treat COVID-19
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) echoed the CDC’s warning against the use of ivermectin for prevention or treatment of COVID-19. That is because ivermectin is not approved or authorized by the FDA for COVID-19. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel determined that there is insufficient evidence and data to recommend ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19. This recommendation is consistent with the Infectious Disease Society of America’s Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19, which speaks against the use of ivermectin in hospitalized patients and ambulatory persons with COVID-19, outside of the context of a clinical trial. There is also no evidence to suggest that ivermectin can be used to successfully prevent COVID-19 infection."
Note that according to AMA, who quoted the NIH in the article, "There is also no evidence to suggest that iverrmectin can be used to successfully prevent COVID-19 infection." But to my knowledge, no one is saying it does prevent infection. It is a treatment for when someone does contract it.
AAPS Response Letter to AMA Re: Ivermectin and COVID
(https://aapsonline.org/aaps-letter-to-ama-re-ivermectin-and-covid/)
"The AMA has taken the startling and unprecedented position that American physicians should immediately stop prescribing, and pharmacists should stop honoring their prescriptions for ivermectin for COVID-19 patients. The AMA is thus contradicting the professional judgment of a very large number of physicians, who are writing about 88,000 prescriptions per week. It also contradicts the Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, who recommended that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.
AMA claims that ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective despite the safe prescription of billions of doses since 1981, and the mostly favorable results of 63 controlled studies in COVID-19."
ABEM Statement about ABEM-Certified Physicians Providing Misleading and Inaccurate Information to the Public
"ABEM recognizes that there are numerous medical issues on which physicians will have legitimate differences of opinions – and that ABEM-certified physicians have every right to express their opinions on those issues. However, making public statements that are directly contrary to prevailing medical evidence can constitute unprofessional conduct and may be subject to review by ABEM.
Should ABEM determine that a physician is promulgating inaccurate information that is contrary to the interests of patients and that adversely impacts public safety, ABEM may withdraw or deny certification for that physician. "
Doctors Risk Losing License for Opinion on COVID-19 Vaccination Deemed ‘Misinformation’ by Certifying Boards
"In a joint statement, the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Family Medicine, and the American Board of Pediatrics issued a statement on Sept. 9 in support of the Federation of State Medical Board’s (FSMB) position in disciplining doctors—which includes revoking or suspending medical licenses—who provide COVID-19 vaccine information that the board does not view as factual and approved by consensus.
“We also want all physicians certified by our Boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective Board to take action that could put their certification at risk,” the statement said."
Why Do Doctors Go Along with COVID Panic Porn and CDC Prescriptions?
The above article provides an excellent explanation about how the medical reporting system forces doctors into compliance.
Canada Starts Cracking Down on Fringe Medical Groups
— Much like America's Frontline Doctors, groups up north are spreading misinformation
(https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94713)
This is pure propaganda coming against early treatment prototcols in order to force people into the vaccine based on misinformation and fear.
"I have the perception that subset, the very right-leaning political fringe, is more sizable in the U.S. than it is in Canada, but we have it here too," said David Juurlink, MD, PhD, a pharmacologist and internist in Toronto.
"To be quite honest, we've never really dealt with medical professionals until the pandemic," said Elizabeth Simons, deputy director of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network. "Typically they will keep a distance from the hate angle, but they're still standing shoulder to shoulder with hate-promoting groups and individuals."
YouTube will block videos with misinformation about vaccines
The question is, of course, is who is deciding what "misinformation" is/
4,200 physicians, scientists sign declaration for early treatment of COVID-19, against gov’t intrusion
Front Line Doctors Fight Back.
"Earlier this month a physicians’ and medical scientists’ declaration was written by a team under the leadership of Dr. Robert Malone, the main inventor of the mRNA technology and a strong critic of the current official response to COVID-19. This text, which defends physicians’ right to treat corona patients with the best knowledge of early treatments and against aggressive intrusion by governmental entities, has now gained 4,200 signatures from other physicians and medical scientists.
Speaking about the official suppression of early treatments of COVID-19, this declaration states: “This is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.”"
Getting Help
General Covid-19 Information
America's Frontline Doctors
(https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/)
FLCCC Alliance
(https://covid19criticalcare.com/)
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko MD
(https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/)
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
Doctors For Covid Ethics
(https://doctors4covidethics.org/)
Prevention and Treatment
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko MD – Treatment
(https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/)
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko MD – Prevention
(https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/prophylaxis-protocol/)
I-MASK+ Prevention & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19
(https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/)
Physician List & Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment
(https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/)
How Do I Get Covid-19 Medication
(https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/)
Other Collections of Links
Covid-19 Resources: Medical, Legal, Forms, Jobs & Other Critical Information
C19 Protocols - Reducing Risk of COVID-19 Infection and Severity
No comments:
Post a Comment